Partisipasi Perempuan dalam Implementasi Program Pemberdayaan Masyarakat di Kabupaten Bantul
Main Article Content
Abstract
Women’s participation is an integral part of social empowerment, yet there are still problematic issues to be tackled and a lot of gaps to be filled concerning with women’s empowerment. This study aims to describe women’s participation in the stages of implementation of the social empowerment programme in Bantul regence, to explain the reasons for women’s involvement in the implementation of the programme, and to investigate factors that support and inhibit women’s empowerment. Research questions included: Why women in Bantul regency are willing to get involved in the implementation of social empowerment programme? How do these women get involved at each stage of the implementation of social empowerment programme? What are the support and inhibit factors in the process of women’s empowerment in Bantul regency? A quantitative approach in the form of embedded case study is used in this study due to its determined focus. Primary data were collected through observation, non-structured interviews, and indepth interviews. Secondary data were collected from related document such as government and NGO reports. The data for the study was analysed by following Miles and Huberman’s interactive model of data analysis (1994).This study shows that although women have been involved and participated in each stage of social empowerment programme, at earlier stage they have done so not by their own conscience but to comply with programme requirement imposed by the administrator. At later stage, their involvements can be seen as a passive participation and were based on a desire to study and to satisfy their constituents.The inhibiting factors in the process of women’s empowerment werethe internal disagreement among programme administrators; women were forced to become programme administrators; over-involvements of the government administrators; the programmes were more physical or material oriented; elitist programmes; lack of family support to women’s involvements. The factors that supported the process of women’s empowerment were the determination in applying women’s empowerment principles and the strong will to learn among the women who in charge of the programme administrators.
Article Details
Jurnal Penelitian Kesejahteraan Sosial is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Â
References
Abdul Wahab, Solichin, 1994, “Esensi Nilai Dalam Kebijakan: Perbincangan Teoritikalâ€, dalam “Kebijakan Publik dan Pembangunanâ€, Z.A. Akhmadi, dkk., Penerbit IKIP Malang.
Ach. Wazir Ws., et al., ed. 1999, PanduanPenguatan Menejemen Lembaga SwadayaMasyarakat. Jakarta: Sekretariat BinaDesa dengan dukungan AusAID melaluiIndonesia HIV/AIDS and STD Preventionand Care Project.
Baiquni, 2006, Pengelolaan SumberdayaPerdesaan Dan Strategi PenghidupanRumahtangga di DIY Masa Krisis (1998-2003), Disertasi, UGM Yogjakarta
Baxter J, 2002, Changes in the gender Divisionof Household abour Labour in Australia,1986 – 1997, in T Eardley and B Bradburyeds, Competing Visions: Refereed Proceedingsof the National Social
Policy Conference 2001, SPRC Report Social Policy Research Centre, University of New SouthWales, Sidney
Becker, G.S. 1964, Human Capital : A TheoriticalApproach and Emperical Analysis withSpecial Reference to Education, New York,Columbia University Press.
Budiman, 1985 Pembagian kerja secara seksual, Jakarta : Gramedia
………..., 1990. Pergeseran Peran Laki Lakidalam Rumah Tangga : Suatu Tinjauan Sosiologis. Yogyakarta
Conyers, Diana, 1991, Perencanaan Sosial di Dunia Ketiga: Suatu Pengantar, Alih bahasaSusetiawan, Gadjah Mada UniversityPress, Yogyakarta.
Dusseldorf. D.B.W.M., 1981, Paticipation inPlanned Development Influence by Governmentsof Developing Countries atLocal Level in Rural Areas, Wageningen:Agri-cultural University.
Holil Soelaiman, 1980, Partisipasi Sosial dalam Usaha Kesejahteraan Sosial, Bandung.
Isbandi Rukminto Adi, 2007,. PerencanaanPartisipatoris Berbasis Aset Komunitas:dari Pemikiran Menuju Penerapan. Depok:FISIP UI Press.
Lincoln, Yvonna dan Egon G. Guba, 1984,Naturalistic Inquiry, Sage Publications,Baverly Hills, London.
Mardikanto, Totok, 2010, Komunikasi Pembangunan: Acuan Bagi Akademisi, Praktisi,dan Peminat Komunikasi Pembangunan,Cetakan Pertama, Edisi I, UNS Press,Surakarta.
Megawangi, 1997. Gender Perspective inEarly Childhood Care and Developmentin Indonesia. Report Submitted to TheConsultative Group on Early Childhood Care and Development, M A, USA.
Mikkelsen, Britha, 1999, Metode Studi Partisipatorisdan Upaya-upaya Pemberdayaan:sebuah buku pegangan bagi para praktisilapangan. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Miles, B. Mattew dan A. Michael Huberman(terjemahan), 1994, Analisis Data kualitatif,UI Press, Jakarta.
Moeljarto, Vidhyandika, 1996, “PemberdayaanKelompok Miskin Melalui Program IDTâ€,dalam Pemberdayaan Konsep, Kebijakan,dan Implementasi, Penyunting Onny SPrijono dan A.M.W. Pranarka, Centre for and International Studies, Jakarta.
Moleong, Lexy J., 1990, Metodologi Studi Kualitatif, PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung.
Nasution, S., 1988, Metode Studi NaturalistikKualitatif, Tarsito, Bandung.
Ndraha, Talizuduhu, 1990, Pembangunan MasyarakatMempersiapkan Masyarakat TinggalLandas, Pusat Studi UNS, Surakarta.
Oey Mayling, 1985. Perubahan Pola KerjaKaum Wanita Di IndonesiaSelama DasaWarsa 1970 Sebab Dan Akibatnya. Jakarta.Prisma 14 (10) : 16 - 40
Pranarka, A.M.W. dan Vidhyandika Moeljarto,1996, “Pemberdayaan (Empowerment)â€,dalam Pemberdayaan Konsep, Kebijakan,dan Implementasi, Penyunting Onny SPrijono dan A.M.W. Pranarka, Centre for Strategic and International Studies, Jakarta.
Prijono, Onny S., 1996, “Pemberdayaan WanitaSebagai Mitra Sejajar Priaâ€, dalam PemberdayaanKonsep, Kebijakan, dan Implementasi,Penyunting Onny S Prijono danA.M.W. Pranarka, Centre for Strategic and International Studies, Jakarta.
Rahardjo, D., 1982, Esei-esei Ekonomi Politik,Jakarta, LP3ES.
Ripley, Randall B., 1985, Political Analysis inPolitical Sciences, Chicago: Nelson Hall Inc.
Ross, Murray G., and B.W. Lappin, 1967, Community Organization: theory, principles and practice. Second Edition. NewYork:
Harper & Row Publishers.
Sajogyo, 1985. Teknologi Pertanian danPeluang Kerja Wanita di Perdesaan, SuatuKasus Padi Sawah Dalam Peluang KerjaDan Berusaha Di Perdesaan, Yogyakarta :BPEE - UGM
Santoso, Amir, tanpa tahun, “Pelaksanaan Kebijakan Dalam Kasus Bimas dan KUDâ€, makalah. Sastropoetra, Santosa, 1986, Komunikasi Persuasi dan Disiplin Dalam Pembangunan Nasional, Alumni, Bandung.
Slamet, M, 1985, Peningkatan Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Pembangunan Pedesaan, Interaksi Tahun I No. 1 : 3-7.
Strauss, Anselm L. & Yuliet Corbin, 1990,Basics of Qualitative Research, Sage Publications, London.
Sumampouw, Monique, 2004, “Perencanaan Darat-Laut yang Terintegrasi dengan Menggunakan Informasi Spasial yang Partisipatif.†Jacub Rais, et al. Menata Ruang Laut Terpadu. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita. 91-117.
Theodorson, GA, 1969, Modern Dictionary of Sociology. In Dusseldorp, 1981. p.33
Tjokrowinoto, Moeljarto, 1987, Politik Pembangunan: Sebuah Analisis Konsep, Arah, dan Strategi, PT Tiara Wacana, Yogyakarta.
UNAPDI, 1980, Local Level Planning and Rural Development, New Delhi : Concept Publishing Company.
Winardi, 1983, Asas-asas Manajemen, PT Alumni, Bandung.
Woolock, M. and D. Narayan, 2000, Social Capital : Implication for Development Theory, Research and Policy. In Research Observer Vol. 15. No. 2 (August, 2000) : 225-250
Yin, Robert K., 1987, Case Study Research Design and Method, Sage Publications,London.
DOKUMEN
Bantul Dalam Angka Tahun 2010.
Bappeda Kabupaten Bantul, Laporan Akhir Studi Evaluasi Indikator Kemiskinan Kabupaten Bantul 2010 Bekerjasama dengan PT Gama Multi Usaha Mandiri.
Buku I Landasan PPME Dalam P2MPD : Pendekatan Perencanaan, Pemantauan, dan Evaluasi Partisipatif, Bappenas.
Pedoman Umum Program Pedukung Pemberdayaan Masyarakat dan Pemerintah Daerah (P2MPD), Deputi Bidang Regional dan Sumberdaya Alam Bappenas, 2001.
Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Daerah Kabupaten Bantul Tahun 2011-2015.