Tantangan Kualitas Layanan Berbasis Smart City pada Sektor Publik dan Privat

Main Article Content

Mar'atus Sholikah
Dwi Harsono


Service based smart city is very crucial to be examined because the features of service products are free and easier to use than traditional. The study aims to determine the difference in service quality based on smart city with conventional. The qualitative method using literature study was used in this study. The technique of data analysis uses content analysis method. Finding of this study are (1) service based on smart city has superior characteristics compared to conventional services, because it is more flexible, elastic, and responsive. Services based on smart city are better able to improve the public service quality, because it utilizes technology based on cloud computing to facilitate and accelerate the flow of information for decision making process. (2) Conventional service quality has different measurement indicators with service quality based on smart city. In conventional service, measurement services quality use the servqual model, while services quality based on smart city implement e-GovQual. (3) The challenge in implementing service based on smart city is the low penetration of ICT, especially in developing countries; fraud in the internet space; the disruption of individual privacy. Therefore, the partnership between public sector, private sector, and civil society is the best ways for the implementation of the service based on smart city. The limitation of this study only discusses the comparison of service quality of smart city and conventional.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sholikah, M., & Harsono, D. (2020). Tantangan Kualitas Layanan Berbasis Smart City pada Sektor Publik dan Privat. Jurnal Penelitian Kesejahteraan Sosial, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.31105/jpks.v19i2.2075


Anderson, R. and H. K. (2012). The fallacy of the context: an empirical study of the influence of the context on the use of performance management in the public sector. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 61(5), 483–501.

Astuti, S. Y. W. (2005). Peluang dan tantangan penerapan egovernance dalam konteks otonomi daerah. Jurnal Universitas Airlangga, 1(1), 1–14.

Avram, E. M. (2014). The particularities of Services and the importance of marketing in higher education. Management Intercultural, 16(32).

Borins, S. (2001). Encouraging Innovation in the Public Sector. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(3), 310–319.

Box, R. C. (2007). Redescribing the public interest. Social Science Journal, 44(4), 585–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2007.10.006

Campo, Salvatore Schiavo and Sundaram, P. (2002). To Serve and To Preserve: Improving Public Administration in A Competitive World.

Chi-Kuang, C., Y. Chang-His, Y, S.-J. and C. H.-C. (2004). A customer-oriented service-enhancement system for the public sector. Managing Service Quality, 14(5), 414–425.

Chua, B. B. and L. E. D. (2004). Applying the ISO9126 model to the evaluation of an e-learning system. Proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE Conference Beyond and Comfort Zone, 184–190. Australia: Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education.

Comin, D. A. & B. H. (2008). An exploration of technology diffusion (No. 08–093). Harvard business school.

Denhardt, J. V. and R. B. D. (2007). The New Public Service, Serving Not Steering, Expanded Edition. New York: M.E. Sharpe.

Dewhirst, F., Martinez-Lovente, A.R. and Dale, B. G. (1999). TQM in public organisations: an examination of the issues. Managing Service Quality2, 9(1), 265–273.

Diyanayati, K., Suryani, & Hidayatullah, N. A. (2018). Sinergi Pemerintah dan Perguruan Tinggi menuju Desa Maju dan Bermartabat melalui Implementasi Program Desa Sejahtera Mandiri. Jurnal PKS, 17(2), 147–164.

Ehrlich, I., Gallois-Hammano, G., Liv, Z. and Lutter, R. (1994). Productivity growth and firm ownership: an empirical investigation. Journal of Political Economy, 9(1), 257–298.

Foster, A. D., & Rosenzweig, M. R. (2010). Microeconomics of technology adoption. In Economic growth center, (No. 984).

Gutie´rrez, P., Va´zquez, J.L., Edwards, J.R. and Vaughan, D. R. (2009). Quality dimensions in the public sector: municipal services and citizen’s perception. International Review of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, 6(1), 75–90.

Halim, A., dan S. K. (2013). Teori, Konsep, dan Aplikasi Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Hall, R. E. (2000). The vision of a smart city. Proceedings of the 2nd International Life Extension Technology Workshop.

Halvonsen, T., Haukness, J., Miles, I., & Roste, R. (2005). On the different between public and private sector innovation.

Hardjaloka, L. (2014). Studi penerapan E-Government di Indonesia dan negara lainnya sebagai solusi pemberantasan korupsi di sektor publik Implementation Study on E-Government in Indonesia and Other Countries As A Solution in Eradicating Corruption in Public Sector). Jurnal RechtsVinding, 3(3), 435–452. Retrieved from https://rechtsvinding.bphn.go.id/ejournal/index.php/jrv/article/viewFile/35/37

Harsono, D. (2002). Kualitas Layanan: Fokus Dalam Dinamika Organisasi Publik. (August 2002), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.21831/efisiensi.v2i2.CITATIONS

Haryani, P. (2016). Evaluasi Kualitas Layanan E-Government Pemerintah Kota Yogyakarta Dengan Metode E-GOVQUAL Modifikasi. Simposium Nasional RAPI XV, 379–386.

Hughs, T., Scott, K., & Maassen, P. (2017). Improving Public Services: Guidance for developing OGP commitments. 46. Retrieved from https://www.opengovpartnership.org/sites/default/files/OGP_public-service-guidance.pdf

Kotler, P. (2000). Prinsip-prinsip Pemasaran Manajemen. Jakarta: Prenhalindo.

Krippendorff, K. (2014). Analisis Isi: Pengantar Teori dan Metodologi. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Kulkki, S. (2014). Cities for solving societal challenges towards human-centric socioeconomic development? Interdisciplinary Studies Journal, 3(4), 8–14.

Lindsay, E. &. (2000). Membangun kepuasan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Lufunyo, H. (2013). Impact of public sector reforms on service delivery in Tanzania. Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research, 5(2), 26–49. https://doi.org/10.5897/jpapr12.014

Lupiyoadi, R. (2014). Pemasaran jasa. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

MacCarthaigh, M., Roness, P.G. and Sarapuu, K. (2012). Mapping public sector organizations: an agenda for future research. International Journal of Public Administration, 35(12), 844–851.

Mori, K. dan Christodoulou, A. (2012). Review of Sustainability Indices And Indicators: Towards a New City Sustainability Index (CSI). Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 32, 94–106.

Moussa, M., A. McMurray, dan N. M. (2018). A Conceptual Framework of the Factors Influencing Innovation in Public Sector Organizations. The Journal of Developing Areas, 52(3), 231–242.

Mulyono, T. (2018). E-Government Berbasis Cloud Computing Pada Pemerintah Daerah. Jurnal Tike, 1(1), 7–14.

Mwita, J. I. (2000). Performance management model. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 13(1), 18–37.

Napitupulu, D. (2016). Analisa Kualitas Layanan E-Government dengan pendekatan E-GOVQUAL dan IPA. Jurnal Penelitian Pos Dan Informatika: JPPI, 6(2), 153–168. Retrieved from https://jurnal-ppi.kominfo.go.id/index.php/jppi/article/view/060203

Neirotti, P., De Marco, A., Cagliano, A. C., Mangano, G., & Scorrano, F. (2014). Current trends in smart city initiatives: Some stylised facts. Cities, 38, 25–36.

Nurcholis, H. (2005). Teori dan Praktek Pemerintahan dan Otonomi Daerah. Jakarta: Grasindo.

Pal, L.A. and Ireland, D. (2009). The public sector reform movement: mapping the global policy network. International Journal of Public Administration, 32(8), 621–657.

Palmer, J. W. (2005). Innovative Behavior of Frontline Employees in the Public Sector. University of Cincinnati.

Papadomichelaki, X., & Mentzas, G. (2009). A multiple-item scale for assessing e-government service quality. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 5693 LNCS, 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03516-6_14

Papadomichelaki, X., & Mentzas, G. (2012). E-GovQual: A multiple-item scale for assessing e-government service quality. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.08.011

Parasuraman, A., Berry, L.L., and Zeithaml, A. V. (1988). SERVQUAL: A Multiple Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, W. and Berry, L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing1, 49, 41–50.

Patel, P. R. & Padhya, H. J. (2014). Smart City.

Randall, L. and Senior, M. (1994). A model for achieving quality in hospital hotel services. International Journal of Contemporary Hospital Management, 6, 68–74.

Ratminto, A. S. W. &. (2005). Manajemen Pelayanan, disertai dengan pengembangan model konseptual, penerapan citizen’s charter dan standar pelayanan minimal. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Robinson, L. (2003). Committed to quality: the use of quality schemes in UK public leisure services. Managing Service Quality, 13(3), 247–255.

Sancoko, B. (2010). Pengaruh Remunerasi terhadap Kualitas Pelayanan Publik. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Dan Organisasi, 17(1), 43–51.

Sheth, J.N. & Sharma, A. (2005). International e-marketing: Opportunities and issues. International Marketing Review, 22(6), 611–622.

Sinambela, L. P. (2006). Reformasi pelayanan publik: Teori, kebijakan, dan implementasi. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Sotirakou, T. and Zeppou, M. (2005). How to align Greek Civil Service with European Union public sector management policies: a demanding role for HR managers in the contemporary public administration context. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 18(1), 54–82.

Sugandi. (2011). Administrasi Publik. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Suwarno, Y. (2008). Inovasi di Sektor Publik. Jakarta: STIA-LAN Press.

Teicher, J., Hughes, O. and Dow, N. (2002). E-government: a new route to public service quality. Managing Service Quality2, 12(6), 384–393.

Thoha, M. (2003). Birokrasi dan Politik di Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Tjiptono, F. & G. C. (2011). Service, quality, and satisfaction. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

Torres, L., Pina, N. and Royo, S. (2005). E-Government and the transformation of public administrations in EU countries. Online Information Review2, 29(5), 531–553.

Walker, R.M., Brewer, G.A., Boyne, G.A. and Avellaneda, C. N. (2011). Market orientation and public service performance: new public management gone mad? Public Administration Review, 71(5), 707–717.

Wijaya, T. (2011). Manajemen kualitas jasa. Jakarta: PT Indeks.

Wright, B.E. and Pandey, S. K. (2010). Public organizations and mission valence: when does mission matter? Administration & Society, 43(1), 22–44.

Yeh, H. (2017). The effects of successful ICT-based smart city services: From citizens’ perspectives. Government Information Quarterly, 34(3), 556–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.05.001

Yigitcanlar, T., & Lee, S. H. (2014). Korean ubiquitous-eco-city: A smart-sustainable urban form or a branding hoax? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 89, 100–114.

Yunissa Nur Widiani, A. (2018). Kualitas Pelayanan E-Government Melalui Aplikasi E-Filing Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Pratama Bandung. Jurnal Riset Bisnis Dan Manajemen, 11(2), 38–46.

Zeithaml, V.A. and Bitner, M. J. (2000). Services Marketing: Integrated Customer Focus Across the Firm, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw Hill.

Zulkaida, A. N. M. T. K. R. H. M. & T. R. (2007). Pengaruh locus of control dan efikasi diri terhadap kematangan karir siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas (SMA). Proceeding PESAT (Psikologi, Ekonomi, Sastra, Arsitek & Sipil). Kampus Gunadarma.