RESISTENSI PETANI : SUATU TINJAUAN TEORITIS
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
peasant, because the concept for resistance actually came from the peasant. Briefly in this paper I would like to convey that if we want to know deeply about the resistance we should now first about the history and concept for building the theory. In this paper, try to make many differences and understanding meaning from many references that talking about resistance relating to the peasant. That resistance can be divided into many meaning, and the main resistances are active and passive resistance. For passive the characteristics are different than in active resistance by the appearance from the kind of how the peasant react to what they think it could be different from what they want to. But for active resistance the appearance more destructive than in passive, since their willingness never gives more attention until they can’t stand up anymore. The form of resistance also many kinds relating to the situation, condition and the culture form the communities.
Keyword : resistance, the peasant
Article Details
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Blanckenburg, Peter von; dan Reihold Sachs, 1990, “Masyarakat Tani Dalam
Pembangunanâ€, Ulrich Planck (Penyunting), Sosiologi Pertanian. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia, halaman 28 – 40.
Calhoun, C., 1999, Nasionalisme dan Civil Society: Demokrasi, Keanekaragaman dan Penentuan Nasib Sendiri. Wacana Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Transformatif 1.
Geertz, Clifford, 1983, Involusi Pertanian: Proses Perubahan Ekologis di Indonesia. Jakarta: Bhatara Karya Aksara.
Giddens, Anthony, 1994, Beyond Left and Right: The Future of Radical Politics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Kartodirdjo, Sartono, 1984, Pemberontakan Petani Banten 1888. Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya.
Kuntowijoyo, 2002, “Masyarakat Desa dan Radikalisasi Petaniâ€, Esai-esai Sejarah
Kuntowijoyo: Radikalisasi Petani. Yogyakarta: Bentang Budaya, halaman
-57.
Landsberger, Henry dan Yu. G. Alexandrov, 1981, Pergolakan Petani dan Perubahan Sosial. Jakarta: Rajawali.
Marx, Karl, 1971, “Peasantry as a Classâ€, Teodor Shanin (Editor), Peasant and
Peasant Societies. Middlesex: Penguin Books, halaman 229-237.
Popkin, Samuel L., 1979, The Rational Peasant: The Political Economiy of Rural Society in Vietnam. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Redfield, Robert dan Milton B. Singer, 1971, “City and Countryside: The Cultural Interdependenceâ€, Teodor Shanin (Editor), Peasant and Peasant Societies.
Middlesex: Penguin Books. Scott, James C., 1981, Moral Ekonomi Petani: Pergolakan dan Subsistensi di Asia Tenggara. Jakarta: LP3ES.
------------- , 2000, Senjatanya Orang-orang Yang Kalah. Jakarta:
Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Shanin, Teodor, 1971, “Introductionâ€, Teodor Shanin (Editor), Peasant and
Peasant Societies. Middlesex: Penguin Books.
Soetrisno, Loekman, 2000, “Pengantarâ€, James C. Scott, Senjatanya Orang-orang Yang Kalah. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Wolf, E.J., 1969, Peasant Wars of Twentieth Century. New York: Harper &
Rowy.