PERUSAHAAN SOSIAL DAN KUBe DI INDONESIA : PELUANG DAN TANTANGAN
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Social enterprise has been acknowledged in Indonesia due to the advantages in achieving inclusive and sustainable growth while helping the poor to improve their economic and social welfare. The main difference with traditional micro, small and medium enterprises is that collective enterprise has a hybrid characteristic in which they adopt business solutions to address social problems. Social and cultural environment is conducive for social entrepreneurship since the country has considerable attention to the issue of people welfare and now is in the movement towards the wider participation of civil society organisation and the private sector on social issues. Social enterprise that has been developing in this country is one of the forms of social enterprise. In its development, this social enterprise involves many poor households at the community level so that it can be viewed as a community-Ââ€based social enterprise. However, the policy environment is still not fully responsive to the growth and development of social enterprise. Social enterprise is still viewed as a traditional micro, small and medium enterprise. Therefore, it requires additional support for social enterprise by providing incentives for mixed financing, improving the sustainable environment for grants, venture capital and external assistance, and recognizing the longer incubation period for social enterprise. To that end, coordination between social sector that gave rise to the birth of that social enterprise with economic sector as further foster parent needs to be further improved.
Â
Key words: Social enterprise, collective enterprise group, community-Ââ€based social enterprise (perusahaan sosial, kelompok usaha bersama, perusahaan sosial berbasis-†komunitas).
Article Details
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Bernard, T. and Speilman, V. (2009). “Reaching the rural poor through rural producer organizations? A study of agricultural marketing cooperatives in Ethiopiaâ€. Food Policy 34: 60-Ââ€69.
Cook, M. and Plunkett, B. (2006). “Collective entrepreneurship: An Emerging Phenomenon in Producer-Ââ€owned Organizationsâ€. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 38 (2): 421-†428.
Dacanay, M.L and Morato, E. A (2004) eds. Creating a Space in the Market: Social Enterprise Stories in Asia. Makati, Philippines: Asian Institute of Management and Conference of Asian Foundations and Organizations.
Dacanay, M.L. (2013). Social Enterprise and The Poor: Transforming Wealth. Quezon City: Institute for Social Entrepreneurship in Asia and Ateneo School of Governance.
Defourny, J. and Nyssens, M. (2013). “Social innovation, social economy and social enterprise: what can the European debate tell us?†In Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A., and Hamdouch, A. (Ed.), The international handbook on social innovation: collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research (pp.40-Ââ€52). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Fonteneau, B.; Neamtan, N.; Wanyama, F.; Morais, L.P.; de Poorter, M.; Borzaga, C.; Galera, G.; Fox, T.; and Ojong, N. (2011). Social and solidarity economy: our common road towards decent work. ILO Reader. In support of the second edition of the Social and Solidarity Economy Academy, 24-Ââ€28 October 2011, Montreal, Canada. Turin: International Training Centre of the ILO.
Gibson-Ââ€Graham, J.K., and Roelvink, G. (2013). “Social innovation for community economies: how action research creates ‘other worlds’.†In Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A., and Hamdouch, A. (Ed.), The international handbook on social innovation: collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research (pp.453-Ââ€465). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Graham, J. and Cornwall, J. (2013) “Building Community Economies: An Emerging Model of Economic Development?†In J.K. Gibson-Ââ€Graham, Jenny Cameron and Stephen Healy. 2013. Take Back the Economy: An Ethical Guide for Transforming our Communities Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A., and Hamdouch, A. (Ed.) (2013). The international handbook on social innovation: collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Nihayati, B. Z. (2011). Empowerment of the Poor Peasants Through Collective Enterprise Group (KUBE) in Sumberagung Village, Blitar Regency, Indonesia. Graduate School of Asia Pacific Studies, Ritsumeikan Asia Pacific University, Japan. (Unpublished Master Thesis).
Novkovic, S. (2008). “Defining the Co-Ââ€operative Differenceâ€. Journal of Socio-Ââ€Economics 37: 2168-Ââ€2177.
Poon, D. (2011). “The Emergence and Development of Social Enterprise Sectors.†Social Impact Research Experience Journal (SIRE) 1-Ââ€1-Ââ€2011. Wharton School. University of Pennsylvania.
Poter, P. and Scully, W. (1987). “Economic Efficiency in Cooperativesâ€. Journal of Law and Economics 30(2): 489-Ââ€512.