NEOLIBERALISME: GENEALOGI KONSEPTUAL, RELEVANSI DAN IMPLIKASINYA TERHADAP KEBIJAKAN SOSIAL MODERN

Article Sidebar

Sosio Informa
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) Untitled (Bahasa Indonesia) Neoliberalisme: Genealogi Konseptual, Relevansi dan Implikasinya Terhadap Kebijakan Sosial Modern (Bahasa Indonesia)
Published: Dec 22, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33007/inf.v2i3.838

Main Article Content

Muhammad Belanawane Sulubere
Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesejahteraan Sosial, Kementerian Sosial

Abstract

Pasca krisis finansial, terdapat ketertarikan baru dalam berpikir kritis soal neoliberalisme sebagai bentuk pengaturan pro-pasar, melalui genealogi ketimbang diskursus hegemonisnya. Ia bisa menjadi sangat relevan sejauh keberhasilannya membuka jalan untuk menguji secara kritis dua pendekatan berpengaruh atas neoliberalisme: struktural Marxis dan Foucaultian non atau pasca-struktural. Dengan mengajukan kuliah Foucault pada 1978-79 di College de France sebagai sentral terhadap genealogi kritis neoliberalisme karena bagaimana ia dapat memetakan kemunculan loncatan-loncatan akal neoliberal dari negara berbeda sejak awal abad 20. Memosisikan perkuliahan Foucault pada akhir dekade 70an ini sebagai sentral terhadap genealogi kritis neoliberalisme karena baiknya ia dalam memetakan kemunculan loncatan-loncatan logika neoliberal yang berbeda antar-negara dari sejak pertengahan abad 20 hingga saat ini. Ia juga menghadirkan, secara potensial, sebuah sejarah masa kini, atau apa yang Foucault sebut, sebuah ‘sejarah kritis atau efektif’: sejarah yang dapat digunakan untuk mempertanyakan garis turunan yang mengantarkan kita pada masa kini sekaligus membuka kesempatan untuk berpikir berbeda. Tujuan tulisan ini dua lapis: pertama, menggunakan sudut pandang Marxis dan Foucault dalam membuat genealogi neoliberal dengan mempertimbangkan periode awal pemikiran neoliberal pada 1920an dan selanjutnya; dan kemudian, menyituasikan perdebatan tersebut untuk memperluas kemungkinan berpikir kritis tentang masa kini dalam rangka mengerti bagaimana politik neoliberalisasi dapat berlanjut dan bertahan hari ini.

 

Kata-kata kunci: Neoliberalisme, sejarah neoliberalisme, Foucault, Marxis, pendekatan strukturalis, pendekatan strukturalis, kebijakan neoliberal.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sulubere, M. B. (2016). NEOLIBERALISME: GENEALOGI KONSEPTUAL, RELEVANSI DAN IMPLIKASINYA TERHADAP KEBIJAKAN SOSIAL MODERN. Sosio Informa : Kajian Permasalahan Sosial Dan Usaha Kesejahteraan Sosial, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.33007/inf.v2i3.838
Issue
Vol. 2 No. 3 (2016): Sosio Informa
Section
Articles

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

References

Amable, B. (2011). “Morals and Politics in the Ideology of Neo-liberalismâ€. Socio- Economic Review, 9(1): 3-30.

Aryo, B. (2012). Tenggelam dalam Neoliberalisme?: Penetrasi Ideologi Pasar dalam Penanganan Kemiskinan. Depok: Kepik.

Barry, N. (1982). The Tradition of Spontaneous Order. Literature of Liberty, v(2): 7-58. Arlington, VA: Institute for Humane Studies. Available from Library of Economics and Liberty. URL: http:// www.econlib.org/library/Essays/ LtrLbrty/bryTSO2.html, diakses 28 Oktober 2016.

Belanawane S., M. (2015). Kampung Siaga Bencana sebagai instrumen kebijakan pengurangan risiko bencana berbasiskomunitas di Indonesia: Politik pembangunan dan partisipasi dalam diskursus pembangunan kebencanaan. SOSIOKONSEPSIA, 5(1): 292-324.

Brenner, N., Peck, J. & Theodore, N. (2010).

“Variegated neoliberalization:

geographies, modalities, pathwaysâ€,

Global Networks, 10(2): 182-222.

Brennetot, A. (2014). Geohistory of

neoliberalism: Rethinking the meanings

of a malleable and shifting intellectual

label. Cybergeo: European Journal

of Geography, Politique, Culture,

Représentations, document 677, URL:

http://cybergeo.revues.org/26324,

diakses 27 Oktober 2016.

Burgin, A. (2012). The Great Persuasion:

Reinventing Free Markets Since the

Depression. Cambridge: Harvard

University Press.

Collier, S. J. (2009). “Topologies of Power:

Foucault’s Analysis of Political

Government Beyond Governmentalityâ€.

Theory, Culture, and Society, 26(6): 78-

............. (2012). “Neoliberalism as Big

Leviathan: A Response to Wacquant and

Hilgersâ€. Social Anthropology, 20(2):

-195.

Crehan, K. (2002). Gramsci, Culture, and

Anthropology. Berkeley, CA: University

of California.

Crouch, C. (2011). The Strange Non-Death of

Neoliberalism. London: Polity.

Dardot, P. & Laval, C. (2014). The New Way

of the World: on Neoliberal Society.

London: Verso.

Davies, W. (2010). “Economics and the

‘nonsense’ of Law: The Case of

the Chicago Antitrust Revolutionâ€.

Economy & Society, 39(1): 64-83.

............ (2013). “When is a Market Not a

Market?: ‘Exemption’, ‘externality’

and ‘exception’ in the Case of European

State Aid Rulesâ€. Theory Culture &

Society, 30(2): 32-59.

............ (2014). The Limits of Neoliberalism:

Authority, Sovereignty and the Logic of

Competition. London: Sage.

Edelman, M. and Haugerud, A. (Eds.). (2005).

The Anthropology of Development

and Globalization: From Classical

Political Economy to Contemporary

Neoliberalism. Oxford: Blackwell

Publishing.

Engelen, E. et al (2011). After the Great

Complacence: Financial Crisis and

the Politics of Reform. Oxford: Oxford

University Press.

Engelmann, S. (2003). Imagining Interest in

Political Thought: Origins of Economic

Rationality. Durham: Duke University

Press.

Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering Development:

The Making and Unmaking of the Third

World. Princeton: Princeton University

Press.

Ferguson, J. (1994). The Anti-Politics

Sosio Informa Vol. 2, No. 03, September - Desember, Tahun 2016. Kesejahteraan Sosial

Machine: Development, Depolitization,

and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho.

Minneapolis, MN: University of

Minnesota Press.

............ (2009). The Uses of Neoliberalism.

Antipode, 41(S1): 166-184.

Fine, B. & Milonakis, D. (2009). From

Economics Imperialism to

Freakonomics: The Shifting Boundaries

Between Economics and Other Social

Sciences. London: Routledge.

Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality,

in The Foucault Effect: Studies in

Governmentality (Edited by G. Burchell,

C. Gordon and P. Miller), pp. 87-104.

............ (2008). The Birth of Biopolitics:

Lectures at the Collège De France.

Basingtoke: Palgrave.

Gane, N. (2013). “The Emergence of

Neoliberalism: Thinking Through and

Beyond Michel Foucault’s Lectures on

Biopoliticsâ€. Theory, Culture & Society,

(1): 1-25.

............. (2014). “Sociology and Neoliberalism:

A Missing Historyâ€. Sociology. 48(6):

-15.

Graeber, D. (2001). Toward An Anthropological

Theory of Value: The False Coin of Our

Own Dreams. New York and Hampshire:

Palgrave.

Harvey, D. (2005). A Brief History of

Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford

University Press.

Hilgers, M. (2011). The Three Anthropological

Approaches to Neoliberalism.

International Social Science Journal,

: 351-64.

(2012). The historicity of the neoliberal state.

Social Anthropology, 20: 80-94.

Lemke, T. (2001). The Birth of Biopolitics:

Michel Foucault’s Lecture at the

Collège de France on Neo-Liberal

Governmentality. Economy & Society,

(2): 190-207.

Li, T.M. (2007). The Will to Improve:

Governmentality, Development, and the

Practice of Politics. Durham, NC: Duke

University Press.

............ (2011). “Rendering Society Technical:

Government through Community and

the Ethnographic Turn at the World Bank

in Indonesia. In Adventures in Aidlandâ€.

The Anthropology of Professionals

in International Development (David

Mosse, Ed., pp.57-80).

Mirowski, P. & Plehwe, D. (Eds.) (2009). The

Road from Mont Pelerin: The Making

of the Neoliberal Thought Collective.

Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

............ (2009). Postface: Defining

Neoliberalism. In Mirowski & Plehwe

(eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University

Press.

............ (2013). Never Let a Serious Crisis Go

to Waste: How Neoliberalism Survived

the Financial Meltdown. London: Verso.

............. (2014). The Political Movement that

Dared not Speak its own Name: The

Neoliberal Thought Collective Under

Erasure. (Institute for New Economic

Thinking Working Paper Series No. 23).

Mosse, D. (2005). Cultivating Development:

An Ethnography of Aid Policy and

Practice. London: Pluto Press.

Nik-Kah, E. & Van Horn, R. (2012). “Inland

empire: Economics imperialism as an

imperative of Chicago neoliberalismâ€.

Journal of Economic Methodology,

(3): 259-282.

Peck, J. (2010). Constructions of Neoliberal

Reason. Oxford: Oxford University

Press.

Neoliberalisme: Genealogi Konseptual, Relevansi dan Implikasinya terhadap 313

Kebijakan Sosial Modern, Muhammad Belanawane S.

............. (2013). “Explaining (with)

Neoliberalismâ€. Territory, Politics,

Governance, 1(2): 132-157.

Peck, J., Theodore, N. & Brenner, N. (2009).

“Postneoliberalism and its Malcontentsâ€.

Antipode, 41(S1): 94-116.

Phillips-Fein, K. (2009). Invisible Hands: The

Making of the Conservative Movement

from the New Deal to Reagan. Jakarta:

Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Polanyi, K. (1944, 1957, 2001). The Great

Transformation: The Political and

Economic Origins of our Times. Boston:

Beacon Press.

Ptak, R. (2009). Neoliberalism in Germany:

Revisiting the Ordoliberal Foundations

of the Social Market Economy. In

Mirowski & Plehwe (Eds.). Cambridge:

Harvard University Press.

Rose, N. (1996). “The death of the social? Refiguring

the territory of governmentâ€.

Economy & Society, 25(3): 327-356.

Stedman-Jones, D. (2012). Masters of the

Universe: Hayek, Friedman and the

Birth of Neoliberal Politics. Princeton:

Princeton University Press.

Streeck, W. (2011). “The Crises of Democratic

Capitalismâ€. New Left Review, 71: 5-29.

Valdes, J. (1995). Pinochet’s Economists: The

Chicago School in Chile. Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press.

Van Horn, R. (2011). “Chicago’s Shifting

Attitude toward Concentrations of

Business Power (1934-1962)â€. Seattle

Law Review, 34(4): 1527-1544.

Van Horn, R. & Mirowski, P. (2009). The Rise

of the Chicago School of Economics. In

Mirowski & Plehwe (Eds.). Cambridge:

Harvard University Press.

Van Horn, R. et al. (Eds.) (2013). Building

Chicago Economics: New Perspectives

on the History of America’s Most

Powerful Economics Program.

Cambridge: Cambridge University

Press.

Venugopal, R. (2015). “Neoliberalism as

conceptâ€. Economy and Society, 44(2):

-187.

Wacquant, L. (2012). “Three Steps to a Historical

Anthropology of Actually Existing

Neoliberalismâ€. Social Anthropology,

(1): 66-79.