Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
Program pemberdayaan masyarakat skema perhutanan sosial (PS) sudah lama berjalan. Program ini bertujuan untuk menyelesaikan permasalahan kehutanan yang mengancam sosial ekonomi masyarakat dan lingkungan. Namun program tersebut berjalan lambat dari target 12,7 juta hektar (dari 2014 hingga 2024), pada 2021 baru tercapai 4,5 juta hektar. Hal ini tidak lepas dari program itu sendiri kurang mengakomodir kebutuhan masyarakat lokal. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bagaimana proses PS dengan melihat dari kacamata pemberdayaan itu sendiri. Studi membahas dari sisi informasi, partisipasi, akuntabilitas, dan lembaga lokal. Penelitian ini mengambil kasus PS di kawasan Sesaot, Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif penelitian ini mewawancarai informan penting secara purposive. Hasilnya menunjukan bahwa fasilitator dan petani masih kurang memahami informasi PS. Partisipasi masyarakat belum terlihat karena campur tangan fasilitator masih besar. Akuntabilitas dalam program pemberdayaan dilakukan dengan melaporkan hasil kegiatan untuk pihak-pihak tertentu. Kapasitas organisasi lokal perlu ditingkatkan agar petani menjadi berdaya. Terjadi penambahan aset dan kemampuan individu dalam mengembangkan usaha kehutanan, namun tidak semua masyarakat mendapat kesempatan yang sama.
Kata kunci: perhutanan sosial, pemberdayaan, masyarakat, kehutanan
References
Agarwal, B. (2020). Does group farming empower rural women? Lessons from India’s experiments. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 47(4), 841–872. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2019.1628020
Andersson, K. P., Gibson, C. C., & Lehoucq, F. (2004). The Politics of Decentralized Natural Resource Governance. PS: Political Science & Politic, 37(3), 421–426. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096504004597
Berglund, B., Hallgren, L., & Aradóttir, Á. L. (2013). Cultivating Communication: Participatory Approaches in Land Restoration in Iceland. Ecology and Society, 18(2), art35. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05516-180235
Chapman, M., Satterfield, T., & Chan, K. M. A. (2019). When value conflicts are barriers: Can relational values help explain farmer participation in conservation incentive programs? Land Use Policy, 82, 464–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.017
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=s4ViswEACAAJ
de Jong, W. (2012). Discourses of community forestry. Forest-People Interfaces, 107–120. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-749-3_6
Djamhuri, T. L. (2008). Community participation in a social forestry program in Central Java, Indonesia: the effect of incentive structure and social capital. Agroforestry Systems, 74(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-008-9150-5
DLHK NTB. (2021). No Title. Tingkatkan Sinergitas Untuk Pemberdayaan Kemitraan Perhutanan Sosial Dan Kemitraan Lingkungan. https://dislhk.ntbprov.go.id/2021/06/15/tingkatkan-sinergitas-untuk-pemberdayaan-kemitraan-perhutanan-sosial-dan-kemitraan-lingkungan/
Erbaugh, J. T. (2019). Responsibilization and social forestry in Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, 109, 102019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102019
Fisher, M.R., Moeliono, M., Mulyana, A., Yuliani, E. L., Adriadi, A., Kamaluddin, Judda, J., & Sahide, M. A. K. (2018). Assessing the new social forestry project in Indonesia: recognition, livelihood and conservation? International Forestry Review, 20(3), 346–361. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554818824063014
Fisher, Micah R., Dhiaulhaq, A., & Sahide, M. A. K. (2019). The politics, economies, and ecologies of Indonesia’s third generation of social forestry: An introduction to the special section. Forest and Society, 3(1), 152. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v3i1.6348
Fisher, Micah R., & van der Muur, W. (2020). Misleading Icons of Communal Lands in Indonesia: Implications of Adat Forest Recognition From a Model Site in Kajang, Sulawesi. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 21(1), 55–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/14442213.2019.1670244
Galudra, G. (2019). Focusing on facilitation: Issues and challenges of capacity development in Indonesia’s social forestry reforms. Forest and Society, 3(1), 133. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v3i1.5995
Kilby, P. (2011). NGOs in India : the challenges of women’s empowerment and accountability. Routledge.
KPH_Rinbar. (2019). Makalah Perkembangan (IUPHKm) Batu Mekar ”Gapoktan Alam Lestari. Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan (KPH) Rinjani Barat.
Lee, Y., Rianti, I. P., & Park, M. S. (2017). Measuring social capital in Indonesian community forest management. Forest Science and Technology, 13(3), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2017.1355335
Lemay-Hébert, N. (2012). Coerced transitions in Timor-Leste and Kosovo: managing competing objectives of institution-building and local empowerment. Democratization, 19(3), 465–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2012.674358
Liu, M., Yang, L., Bai, Y., & Min, Q. (2018). The impacts of farmers’ livelihood endowments on their participation in eco-compensation policies: Globally important agricultural heritage systems case studies from China. Land Use Policy, 77, 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.054
Luo, L., Wang, Y., & Qin, L. (2014). Incentives for promoting agricultural clean production technologies in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 74, 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.045
Mbeche, R. M., & Dorward, P. (2014). Privatisation, empowerment and accountability: What are the policy implications for establishing effective farmer organisations? Land Use Policy, 36, 285–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.08.014
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis. SAGE Publications.
Mittal, S., & Mehar, M. (2016). Socio-economic Factors Affecting Adoption of Modern Information and Communication Technology by Farmers in India: Analysis Using Multivariate Probit Model. The Journal ofAgricultural Education and Extension, 22(2), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2014.997255
MoEF. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Republik Indonesia Nomor P.83/MENLHK/SETJEN/KUM.1/10/2016 Tentang Perhutanan Sosial. Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Republik Indonesia.
MoEF. (2021). Capaian TORA Dan Perhutanan Sosial Di Tahun 2021. http://ppid.menlhk.go.id/berita/siaran-pers/6330/capaian-tora-dan-perhutanan-sosial-di-tahun-2021
Moeliono, M., Thuy, P. T., Waty Bong, I., Wong, G. Y., & Brockhaus, M. (2017). Social Forestry - why and for whom? A comparison of policies in Vietnam and Indonesia. Forest and Society, 1(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v1i2.2484
Narayan, D. (2002). Empowerment and Poverty Reduction : A Sourcebook. World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/15239
Peraturan Menteri Kehutanan No 37 Tahun 2007 tentang Hutan Kemasyarakatan (HKm). (n.d.).
Peraturan Menteri Kehutanan No 39 Tahun 2013 tentang Program Kemitraan Kehutanan. (n.d.).
Peraturan Menteri Kehutanan Nomor 49 Tahun 2008 Tentang Hutan Desa. (n.d.).
Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan No 9 Tahun 2021Tentang Pengelolaan Perhutanan Sosial. (2021).
Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan No 9 Tahun 2021Tentang Pengelolaan Perhutanan Sosial.
PP No. 6 Tahun 2007. (2007). Peraturan Pemerintah No. 6 Tahun 2007 tentang Tata Hutan Dan Penyusunan Rencana Pengelolaan Hutan Serta Pemanfaatan Hutan.
Purnomo, M., Hadiwiyono, E., Andriatmoko, N. D., Pariasa, I. I., Kustanti, A., & Faust, H. (2022). Transformation Role of Forest Farmer Group’s (FFGs) in Indonesia from Development Agent to Brokering Project. SAGE Open, 12(1), 215824402210821. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221082144
Rakatama, A., & Pandit, R. (2020). Reviewing social forestry schemes in Indonesia: Opportunities and challenges. Forest Policy and Economics, 111, 102052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102052
ROSLINDA, E., EKYASTUTI, W., & KARTIKAWATI, S. M. (2017). Social capital of community forest management on Nusapati Village, Mempawah District, West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity, 18(2), 548–554. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d180215
Sahide, M. A. K., Fisher, M. R., Erbaugh, J. T., Intarini, D., Dharmiasih, W., Makmur, M., Faturachmat, F., Verheijen, B., & Maryudi, A. (2020). The boom of social forestry policy and the bust of social forests in Indonesia: Developing and applying an access-exclusion framework to assess policy outcomes. Forest Policy and Economics, 120, 102290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102290
Suharjito, D., & Wulandari, C. (2019). A reflection of Social Forestry in 2019: Towards inclusive and collaborative government approaches. Forest and Society, 3(1), 137. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v3i1.6099
Suradireja, D. Y., Pramaria, A., Markum, Santoso, W. J., & Hakim, M. R. (2018). Menoleh Jalan Panjang Hutan Kemasyarakatan. Catatan Perjalanan Tiga Dasawarsa Program Hutan Kemasyarakatan di Pulau Lombok. CV Bee Media Publisher.
Uphoff, N. (2005). Analytical Issues in Measuring Empowerment at the Community and Local Levels. In D. Narayan (Ed.), Measuring Empowerment : Cross Disciplinary Perspectives. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/7441
Waddington, H., Snilstveit, B., Hombrados, J., Vojtkova, M., Phillips, D., Davies, P., & White, H. (2014). Farmer Field Schools for Improving Farming Practices and Farmer Outcomes: A Systematic Review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.4073/CSR.2014.6
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. SAGE Publications.
Zakaria, A. K. (2010). Program Pengembangan Agribisnis Kedelai Dalam Peningkatan Produksi dan Pendapatan Petani. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pertanian, 29(4). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21082/jp3.v29n4.2010.p147-153
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2022 Yumantoko