Sosio Konsepsia: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesejahteraan Sosial

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2018): Sosio Konsepsia
Articles

MENGELOLA SUMBER DAYA MILIK BERSAMA UNTUK PEMBERDAYAAN MASYARAKAT MENGGUNAKAN PENDEKATAN “HYBRID INSTITUTIONS”: BUM DESA

PDF
Managing Common Pool Resource For Village Empowerment Used “Hybrid Institutions” Approach: Village-Owned Enterprise
  • Fajar Sidik,
  • Fatih Gama Abisono Nasution,
  • Herawati Herawati
Fajar Sidik
Sekolah Tinggi Pembangunan Masyarakat Desa "APMD" Yogyakarta
Fatih Gama Abisono Nasution
Sekolah Tinggi Pembangunan Masyarakat Desa "APMD" Yogyakarta
Herawati Herawati
Sekolah Tinggi Pembangunan Masyarakat Desa "APMD" Yogyakarta
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33007/ska.v8i1.1503

Published 2019-01-08

How to Cite

Sidik, F., Nasution, F. G. A., & Herawati, H. (2019). MENGELOLA SUMBER DAYA MILIK BERSAMA UNTUK PEMBERDAYAAN MASYARAKAT MENGGUNAKAN PENDEKATAN “HYBRID INSTITUTIONS”: BUM DESA. Sosio Konsepsia: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Kesejahteraan Sosial, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.33007/ska.v8i1.1503
Copyright Notice
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

Abstract

                                                               

This study aims to explore on the one of best Village Enterprise (BUM Desa) in managing and in utilizing the benefit from natural pool as the tourism destination to village empowerment in Ponggok Village, Klaten Regency. The background this study is started from the problem of the increasing number of BUM Desa significantly after the policy of Law Number 6/2014 about Village is set, however, only a few are considered capable of active and productive. Then, this problem is understood as the using of conceptual theory of hybrid institutions. The research approach is qualitative with case study method is used to explore problems in the field. Interview, observation and documentation techniques are used to collect primary and secondary data during the process of exploration activities. We have analyzed secondary and primary data using qualitative data analysis steps according to Miles and Huberman. The finding from our research shows that  we are succeed in conceptualizing the model and explaining the working mechanism of BUM Desa as hybrid institutions in managing and utilizingof the financial beneficiaries from the natural pool for village empowerment according to the version of Ponggok Village Government.

 

Keywords: village, common pool resource, the village of nature tourism, village-owned enterprise (BUM Desa), hybrid institutions, village empowerment, ponggok village, klaten regency

PDF
Managing Common Pool Resource For Village Empowerment Used “Hybrid Institutions” Approach: Village-Owned Enterprise

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Agrawal, A., & Gupta, K. (2005). Decentralization and Participation: The Governance of Common Pool Resources in Nepal’s Terai. World Development, 33(7), 1101–1114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.04.009
  2. Antlov, H., Wetterberg, A., & Dharmawan, L. (2016). Village Governance, Community Life, and the 2014 Village Law in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economical Studies, 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2015.1129047
  3. Bromley, D. W. (1992). The Commons, Common Property, and Environmental Policy. Environmental and Resougce Economics, 2(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00324686
  4. Bungin, B. (2006). Analisis Data Penelitian Kualitatif: Pemahaman Filosofis dan Metodologis ke Arah Penguasaan Model Aplikasi. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
  5. Chou, C. (2010). The Local Governance of Common Pool Resources: The Case of Irrigation Water in Cambodia. Cambodia: Cambodia Development Resource Institute. Retrieved from https://www.cdri.org.kh/publication-page-old/pub/wp/wp47e.pdf
  6. Eko, S. (2014). Desa Membangun Indonesia (Pertama). Sleman: Forum Pengembangan Pembaharuan Desa (FPPD).
  7. Gerber, J.-D., Nahrath, S., Reynard, E., & Thomi, L. (2008). The role of common pool resource institutions in the implementation of Swiss natural resource management policy. International Journal of the Commons, 2(2), 222–247. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.44
  8. German, L. A., & Keeler, A. (2010). “Hybrid Institutionsâ€: Applications of Common Property Theory Beyond Discrete Property Regimes. International Journal of the Commons, 4(1), 571–596.
  9. German, L., & Keeler, A. (2009). “Hybrid institutionsâ€: Applications of common property theory beyond discrete tenure regimes. International Journal of the Commons, 4(1), 571. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.108
  10. Hanida, R. P., Irawan, B., Syamsurizaldi, S., & Rahayu, W. K. (2017). Collaboration of Stakeholders In Formation and Development Nagari-Owned Enterprise. Policy & Governance Review, 1(3), 213. https://doi.org/10.30589/pgr.v1i3.58
  11. Hardijono, R., Maryunani, M., Yustika, A. E., & Ananda, C. F. (2014). Economic Independence Of The Village Through Institutional Village Enterprises (BUMDes). IOSR Journal of Economics and Finance, 3(2), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.9790/5933-03232130
  12. Hardin, G. (1968). The Tragedy of the Commons. Science, New Series, 162(3859), 1243–1248.
  13. Heltberg, R. (2002). Property Rights and Natural Resource Management in Developing Country. Journal of Economic Surveys, 16(2).
  14. Kementerian Keuangan. (2018). Perubahan Rincian Dana Desa Menurut Daerah Kabupaten dan Kota Tahun Anggaran 2018. Retrieved from http://www.djpk.kemenkeu.go.id/?p=5800
  15. Kementerian Pariwisata. (2014). PNPM Mandiri Pariwisata. Retrieved from http://www.kemenpar.go.id/asp/detil.asp?c=21&id=2504
  16. Kompas. (2015). Kementerian Desa Targetkan 40.000 BUMDes Dibentuk Tahun Ini. Kompas.Com. Retrieved from https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2015/02/02/03565271/Kementerian.Desa.Targetkan.40.000.BUMDes.Dibentuk.Tahun.Ini
  17. Kompas. (2016). Contohlah Desa Ponggok, Setahun Hasilkan Rp 6,5 Miliar. Kompas.Com. Retrieved from https://regional.kompas.com/read/2016/09/27/06320091/contohlah.desa.ponggok.setahun.hasilkan.rp.6.5.miliar
  18. Kompas. (2017a). Dana Rp 1,1 Miliar Untuk Desa Tertinggal Dianggap Kurang. Kompas.Com. Retrieved from https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2017/02/01/15251321/dana.rp.1.1.miliar.untuk.desa.tertinggal.dianggap.kurang
  19. Kompas. (2017b). Jumlah BUMDes Mencapai 18.446 Unit. Kompas.Com. Retrieved from https://ekonomi.kompas.com/read/2017/03/27/185143526/jumlah.bumdes.mencapai.18.446.unit
  20. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1994). An Expended Sourcebook: Qualitative Data Analysis (Second Edition). USA: Sage Publication.
  21. Moleong, L. J. (2002). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
  22. Ostrom, E. (2006). The value-added of laboratory experiments for the study of institutions and common-pool resources. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 61, 149–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2005.02.008
  23. Ostrom, E. (2008). The Challenge of Common-Pool Resources. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 50(4), 8–21. https://doi.org/10.3200/ENVT.50.4.8-21
  24. Pollock, I., & Kendrick, A. (2015). 15 Years of Indonesia’s National Community-Driven Development Programs. Jakarta: The World Bank – PNPM Support Facility, Jakarta, Indonesia.
  25. Prabowo, T. H. E. (2014). Developing Bumdes (Village-owned Enterprise) for Sustainable Poverty Alleviation Model Village Community Study in Bleberan-Gunung Kidul-Indonesia. World Applied Sciences Journal 30 (Innovation Challenges in Multidiciplinary Research & Practice), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2014.30.icmrp.4
  26. Rist, S., Chidambaranathan, M., Escobar, C., Wiesmann, U., & Zimmermann, A. (2007). Moving from sustainable management to sustainable governance of natural resources: The role of social learning processes in rural India, Bolivia and Mali. Journal of Rural Studies, 23(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.02.006
  27. Schlager, E., & Ostrom, E. (1992). Property-Rights Regimes and Natural Resources: A Conceptual Analysis. Land Economics, 68(3), 249–262. https://doi.org/10.2307/3146375
  28. Setyobakti, M. H. (2017). Identification of Business Enterprises Bumdes Based on Social and Economic Aspect. Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Akuntansi Dan Manajemen (JEMA), 14(2), 10.
  29. Suastika, I. N. (2017). Village Enterprises (A Case Study of Rural Enterprise-Based Social Capital at The Purwakerti Village Community). South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law, 12(4), 4.
  30. Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&B. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  31. Sumaryadi, I. N., & Saputra, R. (2017). The Role of The Village Business Agency As Creative Economic Implementation In Order of Community Empowerment of Villages of Cagak Road Subang District West Java Province. International Journal of Information Technology and Business Management, 58(1), 14.
  32. Suriadi, A., Rudjiman, Mahalli, K., Achmad, N., & Muda, I. (2015). The Applicative Model of The Village_Owned Enterprises (BUMDes) Development In North Sumatera. European Centre for Research Training and Development UK, 3(12), 48–62.
  33. Tempo. (2017). Ponggok Jadi Desa Wisata Terbaik, Ratusan Warganya Jadi Investor - Nasional Tempo.co.html. Tempo. Retrieved from https://nasional.tempo.co/read/876100/ponggok-jadi-desa-wisata-terbaik-ratusan-warganya-jadi-investor
  34. The Jakarta Post. (2017a). Govt announces progress in human development, cultural affairs. The Jakarta Post.com. Retrieved from http://www.thejakartapost.com/adv/2017/10/27/govt-announces-progress-in-human-development-cultural-affairs.html
  35. The Jakarta Post. (2017b). Ponggok: example of independent village financially. The Jakarta Post.com. Retrieved from http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2017/08/24/ponggok-example-of-independent-village-financially.html
  36. Viva. (2016). Desa Wisata Tak Lagi Jadi Fokus Kementerian Pariwisata. Viva.Co.Id. Retrieved from https://www.viva.co.id/berita/bisnis/757120-desa-wisata-tak-lagi-jadi-fokus-kementerian-pariwisata
  37. Wade, R. (1987). The Management of Common Property Resources : Collective Action as an Alternative to Privatisation or State Regulation. Cambridge Journal of Economic, 11, 95–106.
  38. Warburton, E. (2016). Jokowi and the New Developmentalism. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 52(3), 297–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2016.1249262
  39. Wiagustini, N. L. P. (2015). Partnership Strategy of Village Owned Enterprises (Village Credit Institutions and Village Markets) In Denpasar City, Indonesia. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, III(4), 1–20.
  40. Yin, R. K. (2012). Studi Kasus: Desain dan Metode. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
  41. Yulianto, T. (2017). BUMDes dan Ekonomi Kreatif. Kompas, p. 6.